Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189148 (ALL)

SOHAN LAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

NA529/3818/2025 · 2025-10-14

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 3818 of 2025 Court No. - 87 HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is the informant in the First Information Report in Case Crime No. 6111 of 2008 (State vs. Sant Lal Seth and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 291 of 2007, under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC, Police Station Line Bazar, District Jaunpur, pending in the Court of C.J.M., Jaunpur. 3. Initially, an attempt by the respondents/accused to seek stay of the proceedings by filing a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. bearing No. 13523 of 2009 was successful, but later on, the said stay order was vacated by this Court. The said stay order was vacated in the year 2021, and processes were issued to the respondents. Though respondent failed to seek relief, they remained undettered and had been filing application for discharge and application under Section 91 Cr.P.C. However, despite their failure to seek any relief from this Court or the concerned court, the respondents are not cooperating in the trial, and the trial is in liminie. Therefore, learned counsel has prayed that the learned trial court may decide the case as expeditiously as possible. 4. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and perused the proceedings of the case annexed by him. It is apparent from the order sheet that learned Magistrate is regularly hearing the case and is passing orders on frivolous applications filed by respondent. However, it will be expedient that the learned trial court should take into account that the said case has been Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Virendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sohan Lal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) pending since the year 2008 and make all endeavours to decide the case as expeditiously as possible. 5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the C.J.M., Jaunpur, is directed to make all endeavours to conclude and decide the aforesaid case expeditiously, strictly in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. 6. The application is disposed of. October 15, 2025 Sumaira NA529 No. 3818 of 2025 2 (Anil Kumar-X,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad