HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4698 of 2024 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. Sri Surendra Kumar, learned counsel holding brief of Sri Praveen Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition arises out of a financial dispute between the parties. The dispute has been amicably resolved through the process of mediation. The settlement agreement between the parties was drawn up and reduced to writing. The first informant and all other parties do not wish to prosecution the instant case in light of the said compromise and terms of the written settlement. The settlement agreement sent by the High Court Mediation Centre is in the record. No useful purpose shall be served by keeping the writ petition pending or the prosecution to proceed with the trial. In the wake of the preceding discussion the F.I.R. is liable to be quashed and is quashed. The writ petition is allowed to the extent indicated above. October 8, 2025 Sachin Mishra Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Praveen Kumar Mishra, Satyam Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Pankaj Kumar (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Doris Anita Jai And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad