Crl.O.P.No.30433 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.30433 of 2025 Pandiyarajan ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs The State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Sulur Police Station, Coimbatore District. (Crime No.914 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant bail to the petitioner/accused in Crime No.914 of 2025 registered on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner(s) : Mr. N. Ponraj For Respondent(s) : Mr. A. Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ******* 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.30433 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner herein, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 01.10.2025 for the offences punishable under Section 4(1)(C), 5(A) of TNP Act r/w 77 of JJ Act in Crime No.914 of 2024, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner/ A1 is the employee under A2, who is running a restaurant; that while the respondent police conducted a search in the A2's restaurant, they found that the accused were involved in illegal possession of 53 numbers of TASMAC liquor bottles for the purpose of selling the same to the general public without any valid permit. Hence, this case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence; that he is in judicial custody since 01.10.2025; and that the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court and sought for bail to the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.30433 of 2025 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent while opposing the bail to the petitioner reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there are totally two accused involved in this case and the petitioner is arrayed as A1; that the petitioner has 16 previous cases of similar nature; and that the investigation of the case is pending. 5. Considering the submissions made on both sides, nature of offence, the previous antecedents of the petitioner and taking note of the fact that the investigation of this case is pending, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 07.11.2025 stn 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.30433 of 2025 K. RAJASEKAR, J. stn To 1. The Inspector of Police, Sulur Police Station, Coimbatore District. (Crime No.914 of 2025) 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. CRL OP NO.30433 of 2025 07.11.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis