Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18910 (RAJ)

MUKESH KUMAR S/O SHRI OMPRAKASH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6346/2025 · 2025-06-17

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23294] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6346/2025 Mukesh Kumar S/o Shri Omprakash, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Gadhwalo Ki Dhani, Village Yalsar, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Sikar (Raj) Through Natural Guardian Wife Sushila, R/o Gadhwalo Ki Dhani, Village Yalsar, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6659/2025 Rakesh Kumar @ Thekedaar S/o Late Mahaveer Adopted Son Pappu, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Gram Koodan, Police Station Dadiya, Tehsil Sikar Rural, District Sikar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Bochaliya Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Poonia, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.) Order 17/06/2025 1. Both the bail applications have been filed by the petitioners under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.71/2025, registered with the Police Station Dadiya, District Sikar for offences under Sections 309(4) & 62 of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case and they are in [2025:RJ-JP:23294] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6346/2025] custody since 25.02.2025. Counsels further submit that after completion of investigation, the Police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter, therefore, the petitioners may be released on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail applications. 4. Considered the submissions made at bar. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners so also the allegations levelled against them and more particularly the fact that the petitioners are in custody since 25.02.2025 and after completion of investigation the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, both the bail applications are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided they shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only)(each) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before the trial Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in the connected case file. (GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)),J Gaurav Srivastava/Sayendra/131-132