Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189094 (ALL)

OM PRAKASH ARYA v. State of UP AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/18007/2024 · 2025-10-07

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18007 of 2024 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. Sri Deepak Kumar Pandey and Sri Vinay Kumar Mishra, learned counsels for the petitioner and Sri Saroj Giri, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 jointly submits that the issue arises out of a property dispute between the parties. The matter has been amicably resolved. The compromise between the parties has been reduced to writing. In pursuance of the aforesaid compromise, the parties do not wish to prosecute the criminal case. This Court had directed the Chief Judicial Magistrate to verify the aforesaid compromise between the parties. The Chief Judicial Magistrate has sent a report after verification of the compromise and identification of parties. In the wake of the preceding discussion, no useful purpose would be served by permitting the prosecution to continue and keeping the writ petition pending. Accordingly, the F.I.R. dated 26.06.2024 registered as Case Crime No. 300 of 2024 under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Dhoomanganj, District Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak Kumar Pandey, Vinay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arun Kumar Bajpai, G.A., Saroj Giri Om Prakash Arya .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Prayagraj is liable to be quashed and is quashed. The writ petition is allowed. October 8, 2025 Sachin Mishra CRLP No. 18007 of 2024 2 (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad