Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189087 (ALL)

MUSTKEEM v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/5719/2025 · 2025-08-10

Krishan Pahal

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5719 of 2025 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. None is present on behalf of the informant even in the revised call. 2. Sri Dheeraj Singh (Bohra), learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rajiv Dhar Dwivedi, learned AGA for the State respondent are present. 3. From the record it reflects, applicant was enlarged on bail by Hon'ble Krishan Pahal, J. vide order dated 11.8.2025 but when informant of the case challanged the bail granting order dated 11.8.2025 before Apex Court in Crl. Appeal No. 1501 of 2026 then Apex Court remitted back the matter to this Court for reconsideration. 4. As earlier applicant was released on bail by Hon'ble Krishan Pahal J. therefore, in view of this Court it would be appropriate, if the instant bail application should be placed before Hon'ble Krishan Pahal J. 5. Matter stands released. 6. Lay before appropriate Court after obtaining nomination from the Hon'ble The Chief Justice. April 16, 2026 Ankita Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dheeraj Singh (Bohra) Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shams Uz Zaman (Sameer Jain,J.) Mustkeem .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANKITA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad