- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21654 WP No. 6466 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 6466 OF 2020 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. THE BRANCH HEAD KARNATAKA BANK LTD BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE BRANCH, NO.650, II MAIN II PHASE, VII BLOCK BANASHANKARI III STAGE HOSKEREHALLI CROSS BENGALURU-560 085 2. THE CHIEF MANAGER KARNATAKA BANK LTD ASSET RECOVERY MANAGEMENT BRANCH NO.39/2, 2ND FLOOR ASVNS BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD OPP. FKCCI BUILDING BENGALURU-560 009 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. Y.V. PARTHASARATHY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. K.A. RAGHAVENDRA S/O SRI. K.N.A. RAO AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 2. SMT. T.S. SRI LAKSHMI W/O SRI. K.A. RAGHAVENDRA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS Digitally signed by ANJALI M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21654 WP No. 6466 of 2020 BOTH RESPONDENTS NO.1 & 2 ARE RESIDING AT NO.284, 1ST "A" CROSS 3RD MAIN, 2ND PHASE, 6TH BLOCK BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE BENGALURU-560 085 …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER AT ANNEXURE-A DT 6.1.2020 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE LVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYO HALL, BENGALURU, CCH.NO.58 ON I.A.NO.5 OF 2019 O.S.26240/19 FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS HEREIN (PLAINTIFFS) AND DISMISS THE SAID I.A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has become infructuous as the suit came to be dismissed. 2. The memo filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners reads as under: "The petitioner Bank respectfully submits that the present petition arises out of - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21654 WP No. 6466 of 2020 impugned order passed under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC in OS No.26240 of 2019. The said suit came to be rjected as being barred by law vide order dated 30.10.2024 passed by the Hon'ble City Civil Judge, Mayo Hall, Bengaluru. In view of the dismissal of the suit, the present petition does not survive for consideration. The Petition may be disposed of as withdrawn in the interest of justice." 2. In view of the above memo, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE SK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23