SUMIT PATHAK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/11498/2025 · 2025-12-09
Abdul Moin, Rajeev Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189052 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189052 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11498 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for respondents no.1 and 2 and Sri Arjun Singh Somvanshi, learned counsel, who files Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.3.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that he does not intend to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedy as may be available to him under law.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. December 9, 2025 A. Katiyar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sushil Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Sumit Pathak .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench