SITARA BEGAM AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/2344/2024 · 2025-11-18
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189049 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189049 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2344 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at the bar that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and final report has been submitted in favour of the petitioners and, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. Learned AGA for the State does not dispute the aforesaid fact.
3. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 18, 2025 kkv/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lokendra Kumar Gupta, Sumit Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Ravendra Pratap Singh, Rehan Mubassir (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Sitara Begam And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench