Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189047 (ALL)

PRAMILA YADAV v. SHRI PAVAN AGARWAL DISTT. MAGISTRATE BALRAMPUR

/2112/2025 · 2025-12-09

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2112 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. The present contempt application has been preferred against the alleged non compliance of the judgement and order dated 29.04.2025. For convenience, the order is quoted hereinbelow:- "1. Heard. 2. The petitioner alleges some irregularities in issuance of domicile and caste certificate by the Lekhpal/Tehsildar to facilitate appointment as Anganbadi Krayakatri. Some complaint has been submitted, but, the grievance is that inquiry has been handed over to the very Lekhpal who was instrumental in this regard. The complaint of the petitioner submitted on IGRS portal is still pending. 3. The competent authority should look into the matter including the grievance as raised in this petition and do the needful, but, with expedition, if there is no other legal impediment, within six weeks unless it has already been taken in which case the petitioner be informed about the result. 4. We, however, make it clear that we have not adjudicated the allegations contained in the writ petition which can been seen while taking such decision. 5. The writ petition is disposed of. " 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in compliance of the judgement order dated 29.04.2025, enquiry was conducted on the complaint of the applicant against the domicile certificate of Ms. Sangeeta Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Prabhakar Tiwari Pramila Yadav .....Applicant(s) Shri Pavan Agarwal Distt. Magistrate Balrampur .....Opposite Party(s) Dubey and income certificate of Ms. Shabnam but despite the report submitted by the Officer finding the complaint made by the applicant is true and correct but no action has been taken till date. So the judgement and order passed by the Writ Court has not been complied with. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that a compliance affidavit has been filed on 11.08.2025 enclosing therein the copies of the orders whereby the domicile certificate of Sangeeta Dubey has been cancelled and income certificate issued in favour of Ms. Shabnam was found to be correct and the orders have already been filed along with the compliance affidavit and till date no objection has been filed by the applicant against the compliance affidavit. 4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record of the case, it is found that the judgement and order passed by the Writ Court has been complied with as final order determining the certificate issued in favour of Ms. Sangeeta Dubey and Ms. Shabnam has been passed and the copies have already been enclosed with the compliance affidavit which has never been denied by filing objections. 5. In view of the facts, circumstances and discussions made hereinabove, the judgement and order passed by the Writ Court has been complied with. 6. In view of the above, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. 7. Notice, if any, stands discharged. December 9, 2025 Anurag CAPL No. 2112 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench