Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18904 (AP)

Gorre Mallika, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/13274/2025 · 2025-08-06

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010261702025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0E0 THURSDAY, THE.SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA - WRIT PETITION NO: 13274 OF 2025 Between: Gorre Mallika, W/o. (Late) Pradeep Kumar, aged 37 years, R/o.Kankaragunta, 4*^ Lane, Guntur Collectorate, VTC Guntur, Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Palnadu District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Guntur Urban, West Division, Guntur District. 4. The Station House Officer, Nagarampalem Police Station, Guntur District 5. Meesala Nasaraiah, S/o. Krishna Murthy, aged about 47 years R/o. Marellavaripalem Village, Nujendia Mandal, Palnadu District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the inaction of respondents 0 no.3 and 4 in not registering the Crime against respondent no.5 pursuant to the complaint dated and further in thretening the petitioner to withdraw the complaint dated 05-05-2025 under the guise of foisting the false criminal cases against the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in of principles of natural justice. Article 14, 21 violation 300-A and consequently direct the respondents no. 3 and 4 to register a crime pursuant to the report given by the petitioner dated 05-05-2025 as per the provisions of Chapter XIII of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha 2023 in the interest of justice and equity. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents no. 3 and 4 to consider the report dated 0 5-05-2025 submitted by the petitioner in the interest of justice and equity pending disposal of the above writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no.4 to secure and produce the CCTV Footage recorded on 13-06-2025 in the 4 respondent police station before this Hon’ble court in the interest of justice and equity. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s.PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following order: APHC010261702025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 050 0^ [3396] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No, 13274/2025 Between: 1.GORRE MALLIKA, W/0.(LATE) PRADEEP KUMAR, AGED 37 YEARS, R/O.KANKARAGUNTA, 4TH LANE, GUNTUR COLLECTORATE, VTC GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, PALNADU DISTRICT. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3.THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, WEST DIVISION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NAGARAMPALEM POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT 5.MEESALA NASARAIAH, S/0. KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/O.MARELLAVARIPALEM VILLAGE, NUJENDIA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the inaction of respondents nos.3 and 4 in not registering the Crime against respondent no.5 pursuant to the complaint dated and further in threatening the petitioner to withdraw the complaint dated 05--05-2025 under the guise of foisting the false criminal cases against the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in violation of principles of natural justice. Articles 14, 21, 300-A and consequently direct the respondents nos.3 and 4 to register a crime pursuant to the report given by the petitioner dated 05-05-2025 as per the provisions of Chapter XIII of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha 2023 in the interest of Justice and equity and to pass 2 Jf £a> Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: ... to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the inaction of respondents nos.3 and 4 in not registering the Crime against respondent no.5 pursuant to the complaint dated and further in threatening the petitioner to withdraw the complaint dated 05-05-2025 under the guise of foisting the false criminal cases against the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional and in yiolation of principles of natural justice. Articles 14^ 21, 300-A and consequently direct the respondents nos.3 and 4 to register a crime pursuant to the report giyen by the petitioner dated 05-05-2025 as per the proyisions of Chapter XIII of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha 2023 in the interest of justice and equity and to pass ..." 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent/State. Perused the material on record. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on written instructions dated 24.07.2025 issued by the Inspector of Police, Nagarampalem Police Station, Guntur District, would submit that the Petitioner/Complainant filed a Grievance Petition in PGRS. The said complaint was endorsed to respondent No.4 to conduct enquiry and take necessary action. Accordingly, conducted enquiry and during enquiry, respondent No.4 tried to complainant for so many times but she was not responded and he also sent his respondent No.4 summon the V N 3 staff to house of the complainant but it was locked. In the above circumstances, if the complainant will come to PS and take necessary action as submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. cooperate for enquiry then the police will per law. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that pass appropriate orders. 5. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is directed to appear before the concerned Police Station and furnish the Court may the information as required to take further course of action by the Police on her complaint. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. prasada registrar //TRUE COPY// assistant SECT10N_qFF»CER To, 1- The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi 2. The Superintendent of Police, 3. The Deputy Superintendent Guntur District. 4. The Station House Officer, District. 5. One CC to M/s. Pillix Law Firm 6. Two CCS to GP for Home 7. Two CD Copies Of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati, Palnadu District. Guntur District. of Police, Guntur Urban West Division, Nagarampalem Police Station Guntur Advocate [OPUCJ High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:07/08/2025 I 2 2 AUG 2025 ”% ^^ Current Ueeiion . ^S^PATCH^J^ ORDER WP NO. 13274 OF 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS