Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 189021 (ALL)

JAGDISH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/11119/2025 · 2025-11-18

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11119 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant despite notice. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.38 of 2024 under Sections 147, 148, 452, 323, 504, 506, 427, 302 IPC and Section 4/25 of Arms Act, P.S.- Akhandnagar, District- Sultanpur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the similarly situated co- accused, namely, Sundar Lal has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 29.10.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.8147 of 2024. Therefore, applicant is also entitled to be released on bail. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering and adopting the reasoning as contained in the order dated 29.10.2025 coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 27.02.2024 and has no previous criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Jagdish be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Askari Husain, Amit Kumar , Rinku Gaur Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jagdish .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 18, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 11119 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench