AJEET v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/11110/2025 · 2025-11-18
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189017 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 189017 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11110 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant despite notice. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.233 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 70(2) BNS and Section 5(g)/6 of POCSO Act, P.S. Hardi District- Bahraich. 3. In terms of the FIR, it has been alleged that the daughter of informant had gone out of home on 10.07.2025 at about 08:00 PM and it was alleged that the applicant had enticed her away. In the statement recorded under Section 180 BNSS, the victim stated that she was enticed away by the applicant on the false pretext of marriage and wrong was also committed to her. In the statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, the victim admitted that she used to talk to the applicant on telephone and knew him for the last one year and physical relations had been formed between them. There is no categorical document with regard to the exact age of the victim which has to be seen at the time of trial. Medical on record also does not corroborate with the prosecution story. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the huge variance in the two statements of victim do not corroborate with the prosecution story, medical on record coupled with Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Bajpai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ajeet .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
the fact that the applicant is in jail since 12.07.2025 having no criminal history, he is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6.
Let the applicant Ajeet be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 18, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 11110 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench