Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:14928 CRL.P No. 2552 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2552 OF 2023 BETWEEN:
1.
MR. MAYANNA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O NANJAPPA C/O MELEGOWDA LAXMI NILAYA, SATHYA MANGALA HASSAN R/AT MAYAMMA NIVAS, NEAR RELIANCE TOWER, UMINIPURA, PAPER TOWN BHADRAVATHI, SHIMOGGA KUNDAPURA TALUK.
2.
MR. VEERENDRA PATIL B., AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O BASAVARAJA PATIL C/O UMAMAHESHWAR CHANNABASAPPA COMPOUND, CHITRADURGA R/AT NO.128, C.N. ROAD, HALENAGARA, BHADRAVATHI SHIMOGGA.
3.
MR. DHEERENDRA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O ANANDA SHETTY C/O SRINVIASA, 1ST RIGHT TURN MILAGHATTA, SHIMOGGA R/AT NO.7-44E, SRIDEVIKRIPA, UDYAVARA, UDUPI. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MOHANA CHANDRA P., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:14928 CRL.P No. 2552 of 2023
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTHA CITY DIVISION, BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-1.
2.
MR. H.T. RAVI AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O THIMMAIAH ADVOCATE R/AT HONNAGUNDI SUNKADAHOLE POST THIRTHAHALLI TALUK SHIMOGA DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VINAY M., HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER) THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 30.06.2017 PASSED BY THE COURT OF XXIII ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE SPL. JUDGE, PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU CITY FOR TAKING COGNIZANCE OF THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 201, 409, 465, 468, 471, 420 AND 120B READ WITH SECTION 34 OF IPC AND SECTION 13(1)(c) AND 13(1)(d) AND 13(1)(2) OF PC ACT AND REGISTERING CASE IN SPL.C.C.NO.305/2017 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:14928 CRL.P No. 2552 of 2023
ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioners. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no appearance for the petitioners.
2. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
BKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38