VIJAY PRATAP SINGH @ BANSHI SON OF GIRRAJ @ LEKHRAJ v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/6389/2025 · 2025-08-13
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18900 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18900 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:31595] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6389/2025 Vijay Pratap Singh @ Banshi Son Of Girraj @ Lekhraj, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Jarga, Police Station Rajakhera, District Dholpur (Raj.). (At Present In Center Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Atar Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 13/08/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 326/2024 registered at Police Station Ramnagaria, District Jaipur (east) for the offences under Section 304(2) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioner are triable by Magistrate. It is contended that the charge-sheet against the petitioner has already been submitted before the concerned court. The accused-petitioner is in custody since eight months and the trial of the case may take considerable time.
Learned counsel further submits that in seven cases petitioner has
[2025:RJ-JP:31595] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6389/2025] already been granted bail, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the petitioner is a habitual offender and against him 20 cases were registered, therefore his bail application deserves to be dismissed.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the period of incarceration and the fact that the trial of the case may take considerable time. The offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioner are triable by Magistrate, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Vijay Pratap Singh @ Banshi Son Of Girraj @ Lekhraj, in connection with FIR No. 326/2024 registered at Police Station Ramnagaria, District Jaipur (east) shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /236