BHOGI ADI LAKSHMI, SRIKAKULAM TOWN & DISTRICT. v. BHOGI LAKSHMANA RAO, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, & ANR.
CRLRC/1306/2010 · 2025-07-28
T Mallikarjuna Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18900 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18900 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010262882010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Between:
1. BHOGI ADI LAKSHMI, SRIKAKULAM TOWN & DISTRICT., W/O.
BHOGI LAKSHMANA RAO R/O. PARENTAL HOUSE, NAKKA STREET, NEAR ZILLA PARISHAD,
1. BHOGI LAKSHMANA RAO SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ANR, S/O. LATE SURAYYA R/O. MOBAGAM VILLAGE & POST, POLAKI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case aggrieved by the order dated 27 2009 made in Crl.R.P. No. 53 of 2007 on the file of the Additional District & Sessions Court, Srikakulam reversing the order of Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Special Mobile Court, Srikakulam made in M.C. No. 04 / 2006 dated 19-04-2007. IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CRLRCMP 1124 OF 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1306 OF 2010 BHOGI ADI LAKSHMI, SRIKAKULAM TOWN & DISTRICT., W/O.
BHOGI LAKSHMANA RAO R/O. PARENTAL HOUSE, NAKKA STREET, NEAR ZILLA PARISHAD, ...PETITIONER AND BHOGI LAKSHMANA RAO SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ANR, S/O. LATE MOBAGAM VILLAGE & POST, POLAKI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD.
...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case aggrieved by the order dated 27 2009 made in Crl.R.P. No. 53 of 2007 on the file of the Family Court cum Additional District & Sessions Court, Srikakulam reversing the order of Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Special Mobile Court, Srikakulam made in M.C. No. 04 / IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CRLRCMP 1124 OF 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3369] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO BHOGI ADI LAKSHMI, SRIKAKULAM TOWN & DISTRICT., W/O.
BHOGI LAKSHMANA RAO R/O. PARENTAL HOUSE, NAKKA ...PETITIONER BHOGI LAKSHMANA RAO SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ANR, S/O. LATE MOBAGAM VILLAGE & POST, POLAKI MANDAL, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case aggrieved by the order dated 27-07- Family Court cum Additional District & Sessions Court, Srikakulam reversing the order of Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Special Mobile Court, Srikakulam made in M.C. No. 04 /
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 149 days in presenting the above Crl.R.C. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V SUDHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER:-
This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the order dated 27.7.2009 passed by the Family Court- cum-Additional District & Sessions Court, Srikakulam in Crl.R.P.No.53 of 2007 reversing the order dated 19.4.2007 passed by the Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Special Mobile Court, Srikakulam in M.C.No.04 of 2006. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the entire material on record. 3.
Pursuant to the directions of this Court dated 01.7.2025, notice could not be served to the petitioner despite best efforts made by the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Srikakulam. Notice sent to respondent was received by him and his statement was recorded. It seems that the petitioner contacted the 2nd marriage and blessed with children and is not showing interest to prosecute the case. Despite best efforts made by this Court, whereabouts of the petitioner could not be known and the Criminal Revision
Case is pending since 2010. Hence, this Court is inclined to dismiss the Criminal Revision Case. 4. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Dated: 29.7.2025 TJN
221 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1306 OF 2010 Dated: 29.7.2025 TJN