Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18896 (AP)

PALAKOLANU GOPAL REDDY v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/13613/2025 · 2025-06-15

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY PRADESH :: AMARAVATt-^ O WL (i'll 7 OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE o PRESENT the honourable SRI JUSTICE \ harinath.n WRIT PETITION NO: r.F on-,r . Between; Palakolanu Gopal Reddy, S/o. Linga Reddy, Aged 73 years Occ Agr,culture, R/o, Thokalapalli Village, Porumaruilla Mandal, YSR Kadapa L/isirici. ...PETITIONER- AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police 4. The Circle Inspector, Porumamilla District. 5. SHO Porumamilla Police Station, Porumamilla, YSR Kadapa District 6. Pokala Bala Subba Reddy, S/o. Naga Rami Reddy, aged 48 years cc. Agr,culture, R/o. Thokalapalli Village, Porumamilla Mandal YSR Kadapa District. 7. Rayapatl NagI Reddy, S/o. Subba Rami Reddy, Aged 65 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o, Thokalapalli Village, Porumamilla Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. 8. Rayapati Chinna Subbi Reddy, S/o. Subba Rami Reddy, Aged 68 years^Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Thokalapalli Village, Porumamilla Mandal YSR Kadapa District ...RESPONDENTS YSR Kadapa District, Kadapa. , Mydukuru, YSR Kadapa District. Circle, Porumamilla, YSR Kadapa Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the 4^*" and 5*'' Respondents in preventing the mobs including Respondents 6 to 8, while Petitioners take up agricultural operations in lands in R.S.No. 63 to an extent of Ac. 0-50 cents situated at Cherlopalle Village, Porumamilla Mandal, YSR Kadapa District and R.S.No.79/2 to an extent of Ac.0-17 cents out of Ac. 0-23 cents situated at Cherlopalle Village, Porumamilla Mandal, YSR Kadapa District illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent police authorities to provide protection to the Petitioner at the time of harvesting Crops within 2 days. as lA NO; 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4*^ and 5**^ respondents to prevent the anti-social elements from obstructing the agricultural operations of the Petitioner’s lands in R.S.No.63 to an extent of Ac. 0- 50 cents situated at Cherlopalle Village, Porumamilla Mandal, YSR Kadapa District and R.S.No. 79/2 to an extent of Ac.0-17 cents out of Ac. 0-23 cents situated at Cherlopalle Village, Porumamilla Mandal, YSR Kadapa District.-^ Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI^ Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: GP FOR HOME ^ Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 to 8;-— The Court made the following; ORDER APHC010262462025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13613/2025 Between; ...PETITIONER palakolanu Gopal Reddy AND ...RESPONDENT{S) The State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following; 2 ORDER:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of respondent Nos.4 & 5 in not considering the petitioner’s representation dated 07.04.2025. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home submits that the petitioner’s representation dated 07.04.2025 will be considered by the 5‘^ respondent, as per law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to dispose off the Writ Petition at the stage of admission itself, directing the 5 respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 07.04.2025, in accordance with law and the procedure contemplated under Section 173(3) of the BNSS, 2023. 2. 3. 4. th 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd-.MRAWABU ^C^^j'6FFlCER //TRUE COPY// DEP To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, YSR Kadapa District, Kadapa^ 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mydukuru, YSR Kadapa District Dnri imomilla P.irrlfi Pnriimamillfl YSR Kadaoa 5. SHO, Porumamilla Police Station, Porumamilla, YSR Kadapa District. 6. One CC to Sri Rambabu Koppineedi, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 8. Three CD Copies. ssb 7 HIGH COURT DATED: 16/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.13613 of 2025 disposing of the W.P. WITHOUT COSTS