HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SECOND APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 66 of 2016 Court No. - 19 HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Case called out in the revised call. 2. No one appeared on behalf of the appellant(s) to press this appeal nor there is any request to adjourn or pass over the case. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. The order has been passed in presence of Shri Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent(s). December 9, 2025 Raj Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Manoj Kumar Mishra, Sharad Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rakesh Kumar Srivastava (Prashant Kumar,J.) Jay Kala .....Appellant(s) Santosh Kumar And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench