Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188930 (ALL)

SMT. MITHILESH PANDEY ALIAS SMT. SMRITI PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/10543/2025 · 2025-11-18

Abdul Moin, Babita Rani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10543 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to amend the writ petition to the extent of adding Section 316(5)B.N.S. in the prayer clause. Let the necessary amendment be carried out during the course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State- respondents. Shri Nadeem Murtaza, Advocate and Shri Akbar Ahmed, Advocate have put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.4 After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue appropriate remedies that may be available to him under law. Learned counsel for respondents has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. November 18, 2025 prateek Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Kumar Singh, Vishwas Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Akber Ahmad (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Smt. Mithilesh Pandey Alias Smt. Smriti Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench