SMT. VIDYAWATI v. STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECY REVENUE LUCKNOW AND OTHERS
WRIC/1003496/2006 · 2025-12-09
Irshad Ali
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188911 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188911 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1003496 of 2006 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J.
1. The case is called out in revised list.
2. No - one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner, however, Sri Ram Chandra Gupta, learned Additional CSC and Sri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for respondents are present.
3. The case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. December 9, 2025 Adarsh K Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kunwar R.P.Singh, Abhishek Kumar, Adarsh Kumar Maurya, Anoop Kumar Upadhyay, Kanhaiya Yadav, Ramapati Yadav, Ramendra Kumar, Triloki Nath Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Sharma, K.K.Tripathi, R.C. Srivastava, Sanjay Kumar Yadav (Irshad Ali,J.) Smt. Vidyawati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Through Secy Revenue Lucknow And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ADARSH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench