RAFIKUL ISLAM AND ANR. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS.
WP(C)/6373/2019 · 2025-10-14
Rajesh Mazumdar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18891 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18891 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010201192019
2025:GAU-AS:13776
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6373/2019 RAFIKUL ISLAM AND ANR.
S/O. LT. AJMAT ALI, VILL. FINGUA, P.O. CHAPERBORI, P.S. SARTHEBARI, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781352.
2: JAMAL ALI S/O. LT. AINUDDIN VILL. KATLA GAON (BENGULI) P.O. CHAPERBORI P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781352 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS.
REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06.
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE (RELIEF AND REHABILITATION) AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-06.
3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY.
TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-06.
4:THE DY. COMMISSIONER BARPETA DIST. BARPETA
Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM PIN-781301.
5:THE SUPDT. OF POLICE BARPETA P.O. BARPETA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781301.
6:THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES BARPETA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781301.
7:THE CIRCLE OFFICER SARTHEBARI REVENUE CIRCLE P.O. SARTHEBARI DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781301.
8:THE CIRCLE OFFICER SARUPETA REVENUE CIRCLE SARUPETA P.O. SARUPETA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781301.
9:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781301 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR K BHUYAN, MR. H A AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : R B BORA (GA, ASSAM) (R-1,4,5,7,8 & 9)), P S DEKA (SC, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT) (R-2),SC, HEALTH,MR B GOGOI (SC, FINANCE) (R-3)
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 15-10-2025 Mr. H. A. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous and does not require any further adjudication. Mr. N. Goswami, learned State counsel appears for the respondent nos. 1, 4, 5, 7, 8 and 9. The writ petition is closed on the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners that the matter has become infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant