ANIL KUMAR v. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TEHSIL PATTI, PRATAPGARH AND ANOTHER
A227/6738/2025 · 2025-11-18
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188909 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188909 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6738 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondent, is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1- i.e. Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Patti, District Pratapgarh to decide the case no. RST/5886/2019 Computerized Case No. T201902570405886 (Anil Kumar Vs. Gram Sabha) under Section 24 of U.P.Revenue Code, 2006, pending before him since 2019, expeditiously within a period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court, pending before him, expeditiously within a period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court, which is contained as Annexure No.1 with this petition, in the interest of justice. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 -Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Patti, District Pratapgarh is directed to make all endeavor to decide the case no. RST/5886/2019 Computerized Case No. T201902570405886 (Anil Kumar Vs. Gram Sabha) under Section 24 of U.P.Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Anil Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Patti, Pratapgarh And Another .....Respondent(s)
expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. .
November 18, 2025 Muk A227 No. 6738 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench