Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188905 (ALL)

VINAY KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE AND 10 OTHERS

/11771/2025 · 2025-12-09

Manjive Shukla, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11771 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority and/or the Revenue Court for implementation of the order passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate. 2. In light of the same, we do not find any reason to interfere with the matter. 3. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate court for redressal of his grievances. December 9, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Shukla, Manvendra Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Vinay Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue And 10 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench