JAGDISH PRASAD v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE , BAHRAICH AND ANOTHER
WRIC/6064/2022 · 2025-11-18
Manjive Shukla, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188894 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188894 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 6064 of 2022 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. The present writ petition has been filed against a private party who has provided financial services to the petitioner.
2. In our view, this writ petition is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed.
3. The petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the appropriate court/forum/authority for redressal of his grievances. November 18, 2025 Lokesh Kumar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiv Ram Tewari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Akshay Kumar Singh (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Jagdish Prasad .....Petitioner(s) District Magistrate , Bahraich And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench