Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188887 (ALL)

SMT. GEETA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

BAILC/134/2023 · 2025-11-18

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 134 of 2023 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. 2. The applicant seeks bail cancellation of the accused granted in Complaint Case No.403 of 2016 under Sections 376-D, 504, 323 IPC and Section 3(2)(10) of SC/ST Act, P.S.- Majhila, District- Hardoi. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was being harassed after the accused was released on bail. Therefore, the bail granted to the accused may be cancelled. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances, there is no sufficient material to suggest that even today, the threat exists against the victim. and there is no ground to cancel the bail application of the accused after a period of two years of filing of this application. Therefore, The present bail cancellation application is hereby rejected. November 18, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sandeep Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Smt. Geeta Devi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench