1 / 3 2025:CGHC:19224 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2889 of 2025 1 - Smt. Nirali Xess W/o Shankar Xess Aged About 62 Years R/o 124, Mudapara, Village And Post - Narayanpur, Tahsil Lailunga, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. (Retired From The Post Of Head Master) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Secretary Department Of Finance, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 5 - Block Education Officer, Lailunga, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 6 - Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts And Pension, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.04.30 11:05:37 +0530 2 / 3 For Petitioner : Ms. Akanksha Singh, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms. Poorva Tiwari, Panel Lawyer (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 29/04/2025 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled for Kramonnati as per the last circular issued by the Government on 10.03.2017 and 08.08.2018 (Annexure P-3) as she has completed 30 years of service. She would further submit that the earlier circulars to grant Kramonnati issued on 19.04.1999, 28.04.2008, 03.10.2008, 11.01.2010, 10.03.2017 and lastly on 08.08.2018 according to that since the petitioner has completed 30 years of service, she would be entitled for second and third time pay-scale. She submits that the issue involved in the present petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in the matter of R.S. Verma Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others [W.P. (S) No. 2805/2002] by judgment and order dated 29.08.2006. She further submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make representation to consider their case in light of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of State of Tripura and Others Vs. K.K. Roy (2004 SCW/1) and the order passed in R.S. Verma (Supra) to which learned counsel for the respondent/State has no objection. 3. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to make representation before the concerned authority. It is expected that the competent authority subject to verification shall decide the 3 / 3 representation of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible in an objective manner preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar