Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010200752025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2183/2025 MONJUWARA BEGUM @ MANJUWARA SULTANAAND 2 ORS W/O AHAMMAD ALI @ AHMED ALI RESIDENT OF VILL- DALANI JURIA, NEAR MASJID, P.O. TINSUKIA, P.S. JURIA, DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782124. 2: AMDANUN KHATUN @ MERINA KHATUN @ AMDANUN YESMIN W/O HUSSEN ALI R/O VILL- SUTIRPAR NEAR MASJID P.O. AND P.S. JURIA DIST. NAGAON ASSAM PIN-782124 3: HUSSEN ALI S/O INCHAN ALI R/O VILL- SUTIRPAR NEAR MASJID P.O. AND P.S. JURIA DIST. NAGAON ASSAM PIN-78212 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K H KHANDAKAR, MR. K M HASSAN,R PARBIN,ANIMA SAIKIA Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 25.09.2025 1. Heard Mr. K. M. Hassan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. P. Goswami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the State respondent. 2. This petition under Section 482 BNSS is filed for granting the privilege of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, namely, (1) Monjuwara Begum @ Monjuwara Sultana (2) Amdanun Khatun @ Merina Khatun @ Amdanun Yesmin (3) Hussen Ali, apprehending arrest in connection with Juria P.S. Case No. 215/2025 registered u/s 85/117(2)/91/3(5) BNS, 2023. 3. The Case diary, as called for, is placed before the Court. 4. The allegation in the ejahar is that on 10.06.2025, informant’s daughter was given in marriage to accused No.1 i.e., Mehbub Rabbani and after marriage, she was subjected to torture for dowry and whereupon, he paid Rs.50,000/-. It is further alleged that despite that, his daughter was assaulted on demand of dowry and that the accused no.1 tortured his daughter as he has affair with another girl and due to such assault, she suffered bleeding from her 2 months pregnancy. 5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there was some quarrel/dispute between the husband/co-accused and the victim based on her earlier relationship. Page No.# 3/3 6. The petitioners were granted interim bail on 08.09.2025 and pursuant to which they appeared before the IO and their statements were also recorded which is confirmed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. 7. In the given facts and circumstances, the interim bail granted vide order, dated 08.09.2025 is hereby made absolute, subject to the following conditions- (i) That the petitioners shall co-operate in the remaining investigation; (ii) The petitioner shall not misuse their liberty to commit any harassment etc upon the informant/victim side. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed and disposed of. 9. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant