Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188843 (ALL)

RAAT RANI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

/1928/2025 · 2025-12-09

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1928 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. Notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with, in view of the proposed order. 2.The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.101 of 2025 under sections 303(2), 317(2), 3(5) B.N.S., P.S. Naveen Modern, district Shrawasti. 3.Learned counsel for applicant, after arguing for some time, submits that he does not want to press the anticipatory bail application; rather he may be granted liberty to file regular bail application and the same may be decided in the light of judgment of Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021. 4.In view of the above, prayer for anticipatory bail is refused and the application is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Avnish Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Raat Rani And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) the applicants file a regular bail application within two weeks from today, the same be decided expeditiously, strictly in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). December 9, 2025 kkb/ NABAIL No. 1928 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench