Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188841 (ALL)

HEMENDRA NARAIN SAXENA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY. P.W.D. CIVIL SECTT.LKO.and ORS.

WRIA/10974/2017 · 2025-11-24

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10974 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. consigned to record. November 24, 2025 Arti/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Siddhartha Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shishir Jain (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Hemendra Narain Saxena .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. P.W.D. Civil Sectt.Lko.And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench