APHC010262032007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 25644/2007 Between: 1. C.RAMANA REDDY, CHITTOOR DISTRICT & 3 OTHERS, S/O C.KRISHNA REDDY, RECORD ASST. GOVT.JUNIOR COLLEGE, PILER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. M.RAMAKRISHNA RAO,, S/O M.MANGAPATI RAO, WATERMAN(CONTINGENT) GOVT.JUNIOR COLLEGE, PALAMANER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. B.KOWSALYAMMA,, W/O VENKATESHWARLU, TYPIST GOVT.JUNIOR COLLEGE (G), MADANAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. M.SRINIVASULU,, S/O M.MUNUSWAMY, ATTENDER, P.C.R.GOVT.JUNIOR COLLEGE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE GOVT OF AP BY PRL SECY HIGHER EDN DEPT HYD 2 OTHERS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF A.P., NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD. 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, KADAPA REGION, KADAPA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue order, writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the G.O.Ms.No.187 Education (I.E.II) Department, dated 16-11-2006 and the consequential G.O.Ms.No.194, Higher Education (I.E.II) Department dt.08-10-2007 issued by the 1st respondent herein as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of power and contrary to their own earlier orders apart from violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 14 & 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit andproper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 33417 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents tay all further proceedings in pursuance of the G.O.Ms.No.187 Education (I.E.II) Department, dated 16-11-2006 and the consequential G.O.Ms.No.194, Higher Education (I.E.II) Department dt.08-10- 2007 issued by the 1st respondent herein pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit andproper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K VENUGOPAL REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER Sri K.Venugopal Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the petitioners are not in touch with him since so many years. 2. This shows that the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the matter and therefore, this writ petition can be dismissed for non prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. If the petitioners fell that cause in this writ petition still survives, they can move an appropriate application within a period of two (02)months. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Interim orders, if any, shall stand vacated. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR