SK.PEDA KHASIM(DIED) AND5 OTHERS v. SHAIK SYDABI AND 3 OTHERS.
SA/924/2003 · 2025-02-28
T Mallikarjuna Rao
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18882 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18882 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010262422003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 924/2003 Between: Sk.peda Khasim(died) And5 Others ...APPELLANT AND Shaik Sydabi And 3 Others ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:
1. NARAM NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent:
1. M S N PRASAD The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
1. This Second Appeal was filed by the appellants/defendants 3 to 6 under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 06.01.2003 passed in A.S.No.48 of 1996 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Addanki, reversing the judgment and decree, dated 25.09.1996 passed in O.S.No.191 of 1989 on the file of Additional District Munsif Court, Addanki.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, none appeared on behalf of the appellants. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M.
3. In the post lunch session also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It seems that the appellants are not evincing any interest to prosecute with the appeal.
4. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, in this appeal shall stand closed.
_____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Date:28.02.2025 MS
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO.924 OF 2003 Date:28.02.2025
MS