Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18881 (GAU)

LACHIT BORAH @ LACHIT BORA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.

WP(C)/5280/2025 · 2025-09-09

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No. 1/2 GAHC010201122025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5280/2025 LACHIT BORAH @ LACHIT BORA FORESTER-I, TAMULPUR RANGE HEAD QUARTER, BAKSA FOREST DIVISION, MUSHALPUR, S/O LATE KAMALA KANTA BORAH, R/O VILL- PUB JANGALPARA, P.O.- BARJALAH, P.S.- TANGLA, DIST- UDALGURI (BTR), ASSAM, PIN-784521 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS AND HEAD OF FOREST FORCE, ASSAM, GUWAHATI-37 2:THE ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST CHD BTC KOKRAJHAR ASSAM PIN-783370 3:THE SECRETARY (FOREST) BTC KOKRAJHAR ASSAM PIN-783370 4:THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER DHANSIRI FO9REST DIVISION UDALGURI (BTC) ASSAM PIN-78450 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P K DEKA, J MEDHI,MS. N M LONGKENG,MR. R. KARIM,MR. P DAIMARY,MR. I H LASKAR Page No. 2/2 Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FOREST, SC, BTC BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 10.09.2025 Heard Mr. P.K. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms. M. Kalita, learned Standing Counsel, Environment and Forest Department for the respondent no. 1; and Mr. B. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, BTC for the official respondents. Mr. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that due to inadvertent errors crept in in the Cause-Title of the writ petition, the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ petition, with the liberty to file afresh. The prayer is allowed. In view of the prayer made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant