APHC010261002020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION Between: 1. GUNAPATI UMA DEVI, W/o Dayakar Reddy, Aged about 55 years, House wife, R/o Door No. 50-91-15/1, Seethampeta, Santhi puram, Visakhapatnam Andhra Pradesh 1. THE STATE OF AP, Home Department, Secretariat, Velag Amaravati, Guntur District. Represented by its Principal Secretary. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam City (District) Andhra Pradesh 3. The Station House officer, Airport P.S, Visakhapatnam City (District) Andhra Pradesh 4. Sanapala Nagachandrudu, S/o Late. Srinivassam, Hindhu, Aged about 50 years, R/o . D. No. 39/25/9/5, Madhavadhara, Visakha Patnam. 5. Sanapala Umapathi, S/o Late. Srinivassam, Hindhu, Aged about 50 years, R/o. D. No.39-18-93, Madhavadhara, Visakha Patnam. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17209 OF 2020 1. GUNAPATI UMA DEVI, W/o Dayakar Reddy, Aged about 55 years, House 15/1, Seethampeta, Santhi puram, Visakhapatnam ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, Home Department, Secretariat, Velag Amaravati, Guntur District. Represented by its Principal Secretary. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam City (District) Andhra Pradesh 3. The Station House officer, Airport P.S, Visakhapatnam City (District) handrudu, S/o Late. Srinivassam, Hindhu, Aged about 50 years, R/o . D. No. 39/25/9/5, Madhavadhara, Visakha Patnam. 5. Sanapala Umapathi, S/o Late. Srinivassam, Hindhu, Aged about 50 years, 93, Madhavadhara, Visakha Patnam. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. GUNAPATI UMA DEVI, W/o Dayakar Reddy, Aged about 55 years, House 15/1, Seethampeta, Santhi puram, Visakhapatnam ...Petitioner 1. THE STATE OF AP, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, 2. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam City (District) Andhra Pradesh 3. The Station House officer, Airport P.S, Visakhapatnam City (District) handrudu, S/o Late. Srinivassam, Hindhu, Aged about 50 5. Sanapala Umapathi, S/o Late. Srinivassam, Hindhu, Aged about 50 years, ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS and to declare the action of the 3rd Respondent in calling the Petitioner to the Police Station and interfering in civil disputes between petitioner and 4th and 5th respondents and further coercing the petitioner to enter into compromise or else threatening her with arrest if a settlement is not made as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction besides violating Petitioners rights guaranteed under Article 14, 19 (1) (g), 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to refrain from interfering in civil disputes and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents for not to interfere in civil disputes between petitioners and 4th and 5th respondents by coercing the petitioners to enter into compromise and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: PHANINDRA KUMAR CHENNUPATI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:M R TAGORE The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17209 OF 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “....to to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS and to declare the action of the 3rd Respondent in calling the Petitioner to the Police Station and interfering in civil disputes between petitioner and 4th and 5th respondents and further coercing the petitioner to enter into compromise or else threatening her with arrest if a settlement is not made as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction besides violating Petitioners rights guaranteed under Article 14, 19 (1) (g), 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to refrain from interfering in civil disputes and pass..” 2. Heard Sri Phanindra Kumar Chennupati, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that in the light of the interim orders dated 24.09.2020, no further orders are required to be passed in this matter. 4. As can be seen from the interim order dated 24.09.2020, this Court directed the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession of the petitioner over the subject property and the existed civil disputes. 5. In that view, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:03.09.2025 KKV s120 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17209 OF 2020 03.09.2025 KKV