Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188806 (ALL)

SATISH CHANDER MATAH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

/313/2025 · 2025-12-09

Abdul Moin, Rajeev Bharti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 313 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Ms Sadhvi Kanchal holding brief of Shri Amarjeet Singh Rakhra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners states that a charge-sheet has been filed in the matter and cognizance has also been taken. She prays that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue other remedies that may be available to them under law. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty. December 9, 2025 prateek Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amarjeet Singh Rakhra, Bashisth Muni Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Ankit Kumar Pandey, Ashutosh Verma, Aviral Raj Singh, Palash Banerjee, Ritwick Rai, Vaibhav Tiwari (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Satish Chander Matah And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench