Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188790 (ALL)

SIYARAM YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF SECONDARY EDUCATION U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

/14134/2025 · 2025-12-09

Shree Prakash Singh

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14134 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard Ms. Manjusha Kapil, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 4 and perused the record. Notice to respondent no. 5 is hereby dispensed with. Instant petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "i. Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the respondents to forthwith comply with the order dated 31.3.2023 passed by the Joint Director of Education, Sixth Region, Lucknow and count the entire period of ad-hoc service rendered by the petitioner for the purpose of pension and other retiral benefits. ii. Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the respondents to re-fix/revise the pension of the petitioner after counting the said service and to pay the entire arrears of the revised pension from the date of his retirement, along with interest at a rate deemed just and proper by this Hon'ble Court. iii. Issue any other writ, order, or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. iv. Award the costs of this petition to the petitioner." After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no. 3 and he may be directed to consider & decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manjusha Kapil, Smriti Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Siyaram Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Secondary Education U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 15 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no. 3/Joint Director of Education, Sixth Region, Lucknow, is hereby directed to consider and decide the same, within a period of six weeks, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. December 9, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 14134 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench