HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10922 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned AGA has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the charge-sheet has also been submitted against the accused persons-respondent nos.4 to 8 and as such, the instant writ petition is rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are the first informant in the instant case and he could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 18, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Somdutta Singh, Anuj Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Dulara And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Civil Sectt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench