AKHIL YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE AND 9 OTHERS
/11645/2025 · 2025-12-09
Manjive Shukla, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188768 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188768 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11645 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the application dated 08.10.2025 filed by the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid application before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided.
4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.3 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the application of the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the respondent No.3/ SDM, Tehsil and District Amethi is directed to decide the aforesaid application of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from date and thereafter proper action shall be taken for completion of the work after deployment of force, if he so deems fit. Versus
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Durgesh Mishra, Abhishek Shukla, Manvendra Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Akhil Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue And 9 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. December 9, 2025 Ashutosh WRIC No. 11645 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench