SAURABH PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
CRLP/10883/2025 · 2025-11-18
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188766 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188766 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10883 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Sri Sanyog Kumar Mishra, Advocate has filed his Vakalatnama today in Court on behalf of opposite party No.5, which is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State, Sri Sanyog Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent No.5 and perused the material on record. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. has pointed out that in the instant case, the investigation has already been concluded and the charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner. As such the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid facts. In view of the statement made, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage. November 18, 2025 Arvind Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kr. Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Saurabh Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench