Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18876 (AP)

K. Aruna v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/13642/2025 · 2025-06-15

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13642 OF 2025 Between: 1. K. Aruna, W/o K. Kataiah Kaki, Aged about 45 years, Occ- R/o Door No.22-2-61/1, Harijanawada, Thimminaidu Tirupathi Urban Mandal, Tirupathi District House Wife, palyam Village, 2. B. Subhadra, W/o B. Guravaiah, Aged about 48 years, Occ- House Wife, R/o Door No.22-2-60/1, Harijanawada, Thimminaidu Village, Tirupathi Urban Mandal. Tirupathi District palyam 3. N. Shantha, W/o Penchalaiah, Aged about 44 years, Occ- House Wife R/o Door No.22-2-58/1, Harijanawada, Thimminaidu Tirupathi Urban Mandal, Tirupathi District 4. B. Devi, W/o B. Narayana, Aged about 47 years, Occ- House Wife, R/o Door No.22-2-60/1, Harijanawada, Thimminaidu Tirupathi Urban Mandal, Tirupathi District palyam Village, palyam Village, ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District at Tirupati 3. The Deputy Superintenderit of Police, Tirupathi Urban (East Police Station), Tirupati District 4. The Station House Officer, Alipiri P.S, Tirupati District 5. A. Jayachandra Sekhar, S/o Late A. Venganna, Aged about 54 years, Occ- Business, R/o Door No.6-7-582, K.T Road, Tirupathi, Tirupathi District 6. G. Geetha, D/o G. Nagabhushanam Rao, Aged about 38 years, Occ- . House Wife, R/o K.K Layout,"Tirupathi Town, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Tirupathi District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents herein particularly Respondent No. 4 in highharidedly interfering with the civil disputes and peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners property of an extent of Ac.0.14 1/2 cents, situated at Sy.No. 169 of Thimminaidu Palyam Viiiage, Tirupathi Urban Mandal, Tirupathi District., on the ascendancy of the Respondent Nos.5 and 6 herein, without having any power or authority or any jurisdiction and threatening to vacate the possession is questioned as the same is arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the well-established legal principles apart from being violative of fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed under articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere in petitioners civil disputes regarding the above subject property of an extent of Ac.0.14 72 cents, situated at Sy.No. 169 of Thimminaidu Palyam Village, Tirupathi Urban Mandal, Tirupathi District. lA NO: 1 OF 202fi Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to Direct the Respondents petitioners civil disputes regarding the above subject property of of Ac.0.14 72 cents, situated at Sy.No. 169 of Thimminaidu Palyam Village not to interfere with the an extent Tirupathi Urban Mandal, Tirupathi District, pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Hon’ble court, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: APHC010262212025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] / MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13642/2025 Between: K. Aruna and Others ..PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): ...RESPONDENT(S) 1.SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER:- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners and respondent Nos.5 and 6 are having civil disputes between them. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, upon written instructions, submits that a crime has been registered against petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 vide Crime No.61 of 2025 on the file of Alipiri Police Station for the offences under Sections 329(3) and 3(5) of the BNS, based on a complaint received from one Smt. Gurram Nagaratnam, W/o Sri Nagabushana Rao. It is further submitted that the respondent is the daughter of Sri Nagabushana Rao. It is also submitted that, in pursuance of the registration of the crime, the petitioners were called to the police station for the purpose of enquiry. Be that as it may, there shall be a direction to the 4*^ respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute pending between the petitioners and respondent Nos.5 and 6, without following the due process of law. 2. 3. 4. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off. No costs. Sd/- M PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT. REGISJRAR //TRUE COPY// N OFFICER SE To, 1. The Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District at Tirupati 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tirupathi Urban (East Police Station), Tirupati District 4. The Station House Officer, Alipiri P.S, Tirupati District 5. One CC to Sri. Suresh Kumar Redsly^lava Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 7. Three CD Copies GSC \ HIGH COURT DATED:16/06/2025 \ \ ORDER WP.No.13642 of 2025 ^ I 7 JUL 2025 DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS