NAVNEET TIWARI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/2260/2024 · 2025-11-18
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188741 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 188741 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2260 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at the bar that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and final report has been submitted in favour of the petitioners, which has also been accepted by the Competent Authority and, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. Learned AGA for the State does not dispute the aforesaid fact.
3. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 18, 2025 kkv/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vivek Kumar Rai, Ajai Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Navneet Tiwari And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench