Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188732 (ALL)

VIMAL KUMAR v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE/SPECIAL JUDGE E C ACT HARDOI

WRIC/1004425/2012 · 2025-11-11

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1004425 of 2012 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. None appears for the either of the parties. The petition is of the year, 2012 whereby an order rejecting an application for amendment moved in Regular Suit no.365 of 2010 was under challenge, however, the record indicates that there is no interim order, apparently, the proceedings of the suit may have been taken to its logical conclusion. In view of the aforesaid, this Court finds that none appears for the petitioner, accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Consigned to record. November 11, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Gupta, Om Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Manish Kumar, Sarvesh Kumar Shukla (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Vimal Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Additional District Judge/Special Judge E C Act Hardoi .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench