HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3283 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the final report has also been submitted in favour of the petitioner and as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned AGA for the State do not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 18, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surendra Kumar Mishra, Ajay Kumar Chuabey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Gulam Mustafa (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Ajay Kumar Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench