GITANJALI NATH ALIAS GITANJALI DEVI ALIAS AIJONI AND 3 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
AB/2178/2025 · 2025-09-16
Pranjal Das
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18873 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18873 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010200942025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2178/2025 GITANJALI NATH ALIAS GITANJALI DEVI ALIAS AIJONI AND 3 ORS.
W/O DIPEN NATH RESIDENT OF VILL- BORIBANDHA P.S. LAHARIGHAT DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM 2: DIPIKA DEVI W/O HAREN NATH RESIDENT OF VILL- BORIBANDHA P.S. LAHARIGHAT DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM 3: NAGEN NATH S/O JUGAL NATH RESIDENT OF VILL- BORIBANDHA P.S. LAHARIGHAT DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM 4: RANKU NATH S/O SOMESWAR NATH RESIDENT OF VILL- BORIBANDHA P.S. LAHARIGHAT DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3 ------------ Advocate for : MS. R CHOUDHURY Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 17.09.2025
Heard Ms. R. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. S.H. Bora, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. By this petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners, namely, (i) Gitanjali Nath @ Gitanjali Devi @ Aijoni (ii) Dipika Devi (ii) Nagen Nath (iv) Ranku Nath, have prayed for granting pre-arrest bail, apprehending arrest in connection with Laharighat P.S. Case No. 136/2025, under Section 107/118(2)/3(5)/342 of BNS, 2023.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to the order dated 05.09.2025, the petitioners appeared before the investigating officer and recorded their statements. It is also submitted that one co-accused has been granted regular bail in connection with this case.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced the case diary and submits that the statement of the petitioners have already been recorded by the investigating officer pursuant to the order of this Court.
5. In the given facts and circumstances, the interim protection vide dated 05.09.2025 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions – that they shall
Page No.# 3/3 co-operate with remaining investigation and shall not hamper/tamper with evidence.
6. Violation or breach of condition(s) shall entail cancellation of the bail.
7. The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
8. Send back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant