Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 188729 (ALL)

MANOJ MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/2395/2024 · 2025-11-18

Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2395 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the bar that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and chargesheet has been filed against the petitioner and, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Learned AGA for the State does not dispute the aforesaid fact. 3. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum at appropriate stage. November 18, 2025 kkv/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogesh Kumar Mishra, Dharmendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Ritesh Kumar Srivastava, Vaibhav Tripathi (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Manoj Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench