IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2830/2022 a/w CWPOA No. 3105/2019 Decided on: 01.07.2025 1. CWP No.2830/2022 Asha Mokta & Ors. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 2. CWPOA No. 3105/2019 Rajinder Singh …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner(s): Mr. Prem P. Chauhan, Advocate, in both the petitions. For the respondent(s): Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General in both the petitions. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submitted that the issue raised in these petitions is squarely covered by the judgment 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 rendered in Arpana Bali Vs. State of H.P. and others2. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner(s) would be content, if the cases of the petitioner(s) are considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid judgment within a time bound schedule. Learned Deputy Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. 2. Having regard to above submissions but without examining the merits of the matters, these petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioner(s) in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioner(s). Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 1st July, 2025(rohit) 2 CWP No.1853/2009 decided on 10.04.2013