HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14163 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Saharsha, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Sri Namit Sharma, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs :- "i) issue a writ, order' or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite party no. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 6.5.2025 and provide the salary of petitioner pending since 2.12.2021 to 26.10.2023 as regular employee for Rs. 4,12,520/-in the department on the basis of compliance report submitted by the opp. party in contempt petition no. 367/2021 on dated 4.8.2021, copy of the representation dated 6.5.2025 is being hereby contained as annexure No. 1 to this writ petition. ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite party no. 2 to provide all the pending dues since regularisation of the petitioner in department, after compliance of the Hon'ble Court order dated 22.10.2020 in writ petition no. 18342 (S/S) of 2020, in favour of the petitioner as per compliance report submitted by the opp. party no. 2, in the Hon'ble Court in contempt petition no. 367/2025 on 4.8.2021." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satendra Kumar Singh, Paresh Kumar Singh, Pratima Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Namit Sharma Ajay Bajpai .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Urban Development Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 2/Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Lucknow and the opposite party no. 2 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 2/ Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Lucknow within the period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 2 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of six weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. December 9, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 14163 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench