HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11556 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated 12.03.2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising her grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No. 3 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No. 3/ Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tahsil Amethi, District Amethi is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Janendra Kumar Verma, Deepak Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shanti Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Commissioner And Secy. Board Of Revenue U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. December 9, 2025 Satish WRIC No. 11556 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench