HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3118 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned AGA has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the charge-sheet has also been submitted against the petitioner and as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners do not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage. November 18, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Mohan Mishra, Aseem Goswami Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Munnilal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench