SUNIL KUMAR S/O SHRI HARIRAM JAT v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/7643/2025 · 2025-07-03
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18870 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18870 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:24485] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7643/2025
1. Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Hariram Jat, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village- Gangti Khurd, Post- Gangti Kalan, Tehsil- Mozmabad, District- Jaipur (Rajasthan), Pin Code 303009.
2. Manisha D/o Shri Sheeshram, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village- Jagiwara, Post- Sarai Kalan, Tehsil-Mundawar, District- Khairthal-Tizara (Rajasthan), Pin Code 310401. ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Ayurved, Yoga And Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha And Homoeopathy (Ayush), Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Deputy Secretary, Department Of Ayurved, Yoga And Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha And Homoeopathy (Ayush), Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. The Director, Directorate Of Ayurved Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Ashok Marg, Savitri College Circle, Ajmer.
4. The Registrat. Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5327/2025 Sonu Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Surendra Kumar Sharma, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village And Post- Jat Behror, Tehsil Mundawar, District- Khairthal- Tizara (Rajasthan), Pin Code-
301714. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Ayurved Yoga And Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha And Homoeopathy (Ayush), Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Deputy Secretary, Department Of Ayurved, Yoga And Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha And Homoeopathy (Ayush), Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. The Director, Directorate Of Ayurved Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Ashok Marg, Savitri College Circle, Ajmer.
4. The Registrat., Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7856/2025
1. Girish S/o Shri Mamchand, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village- Bagheri Khurd, Post- Bagheri Kalan, Tehsil-
[2025:RJ-JP:24485] (2 of 3) [CW-7643/2025] Kotkasim, District- Khairthal-Tizara (Rajasthan), Pin Code
301403.
2. Jagdish Prashad S/o Shri Hukma Ram, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village- Bagheri Khurd, Post- Bagheri Kalan, Tehsil-Kotkasim, District- Khairthal-Tizara (Rajasthan), Pin Code 301403. ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Ayurved, Yoga And Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha And Homoeopathy (Ayush), Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Deputy Secretary, Department Of Ayurved, Yoga And Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha And Homoeopathy (Ayush), Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. The Director, Directorate Of Ayurved Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Ashok Marg, Savitri College Circle, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shashank Bhansali for Mr. Rohit Choudhary Mr. O.P. Mishra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishesh Sharma Mr. Parth Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 03/07/2025
1. In this batch of writ petitions, petitioners have prayed to award 10% bonus mark to consider their candidature on merits on the post of Compounder/ Nurse Junior Grade in the Department of Aayurved.
2. Indisputably, petitioners already preferred writ petitions before the Rajasthan High Court at Principal seat- Jodhpur, praying for similar relief and their writ petitions were dismissed on merits, however, without disclosing such fact, petitioners have filed instant writ petitions afresh before this Court.
[2025:RJ-JP:24485] (3 of 3) [CW-7643/2025]
3. Petitioners have submitted their unconditional apology before this Court, stating inter alia that aforesaid mistake was committed bona fidely and they pray withdrawal of these writ petitions.
4. Taking into consideration the unconditional apology tendered by petitioners and the fact that petitioners are unemployed and aspirants of the post in question, this Court is not inclined to take any coercive action against the petitioners, either for criminal prosecution or imposition of cost. Apology, tendered by petitioners, is accepted.
5. Permission for withdrawal of writ petitions is granted.
6. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
7. Interim order dated 09.04.2025 passed in favour of petitioner in SBCWP No.5327/2025, comes to an end.
8. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/125-127