Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18870 (ALL)

ASIF RAZA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1579/2025 · 2025-05-21

Vivek Varma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:86827 Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1579 of 2025 Applicant :- Asif Raza Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mahendra Kumar Yadav,Vipin Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sunil Kumar Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. 1. Case called out in the revised list. Counsel for the informant is not present. 2. Heard counsel for the applicant, Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. The instant application has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 471 of 2024, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of I.P.C., Police Station- Kishani, District- Mainpuri. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant along with his brothers, Ahmad Raza and Arif Raza executed a registered sale deed dated 16.02.2024 in favour of the informant. Subsequent, thereto, the informant was placed under possession. The applicant has not executed any notarial affidavit dated 28.06.2024. The case of the applicant is clearly distinguishable from that of the co-accused, Vimal. The case is purely civil in nature. At this stage, there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. The investigation is still pending. It is next submitted that the applicant has apprehension of his arrest and in case, the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he will not misuse the said liberty. 5. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 6. Counsel for the applicant further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report. 7. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the applicant, considering the nature of accusations, antecedents of the applicant and the fact that the applicant along with his brothers, Ahmad Raza and Arif Raza executed a registered sale deed dated 16.02.2024 in favour of the informant; the case is purely civil in nature and at this stage, there is no substantive evidence against the applicant, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report. 8. In the event of arrest, the applicant- Asif Raza be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 193 (3) B.N.S.S., on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the Police Commissioner concerned. 9. In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant. 10. The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant. 11. The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order. 12. The application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 22.5.2025 Sachin Mishra Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad